MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALBUQUERQUE, E. X.
Right arrow Articles by WARNICK, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ALBUQUERQUE, E. X.
Right arrow Articles by WARNICK, J. E.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 12, 82-91, Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Kinetics of Interaction of Batrachotoxin and Tetrodotoxin on Rat Diaphragm Muscle

E. X. ALBUQUERQUE 1, N. BROOKES 1, R. ONUR 1, and J. E. WARNICK 1

1 Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201

The interaction between batrachotoxin (BTX) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) and local anesthetics (procaine and lidocaine) was examined on rat diaphragm muscle at 37°. At low concentrations TTX shifted the curve for BTX-induced membrane depolarization to the right, and at higher concentrations it depressed the maximal membrane depolarization induced by BTX. A plot of log (dose ratio - 1) vs. log TTX concentration gave a straight line with a slope of 1.31. The estimated dissociation constant KB of TTX was 30.2 nM. Both procaine and lidocaine inhibited BTX-induced membrane depolarization when applied either before or during exposure to BTX; a form of noncompetitive antagonism was disclosed. Although TTX reversed the depolarization induced by BTX, the persistent and irreversible action of BTX became apparent after TTX had been washed from the bath. When procaine and lidocaine were applied in a similar manner the repolarization of the muscle membrane was incomplete; upon washing in drug-free physiological solution, the membrane potential and frequency of spontaneous miniature end plate potentials returned toward control values. During the protective action of procaine and lidocaine, sodium activation associated with an action potential was only slightly reduced. The results suggest that TTX and BTX react with different sites along the same sodium channel, but that procaine and lidocaine probably interfere with the binding of BTX to its receptor site.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Ms. Mabel A. Zelle for expert technical and secretarial assistance, and Dr. Sharad Deshpande for helpful criticism of the manuscript. We also thank Drs. John W. Daly and Bernhard Witkop for their generous supply of batrachotoxin and for their helpful criticism of the manuscript.

Submitted on April 24, 1975







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics