MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wachtel, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wachtel, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, W. J.

Barbiturate effects on acetylcholine-activated channels in Aplysia neurons

RE Wachtel and WA Wilson

The effects of pentobarbital, phenobarbital, amobarbital, and diphenylbarbituric acid were studied by examining the average lifetime and conductance of acetylcholine-activated sodium channels in Aplysia neurons. Although none of the barbiturates tested modified the conductance of single-ion channels, pentobarbital and amobarbital had profound effects on channel lifetime. In the absence of barbiturate, relaxations in response to voltage jumps during steady-state current responses to acetylcholine have a single-exponential time course. In the presence of pentobarbital (75-500 microM), current relaxations consist of two exponential components that take the same direction as control relaxations. The faster component becomes faster and relatively larger at higher pentobarbital concentrations, while the slower component always has the same time constant as control. These results are not consistent with a sequential model of channel blockade described for local anesthetics, in which blocked channels must become unblocked before channel closure can occur. Kinetic data are better explained by a cyclic model in which blocked channels have the same probability of closing as nonblocked channels. Alternatively, the results can also be explained by a two-site model in which one binding site regulates the susceptibility of channels to the effects of the barbiturate, whereas occupation of the second site determines the extent of changes in channel lifetime. The effects of amobarbital were qualitatively similar to those of pentobarbital, while phenobarbital and diphenylbarbituric acid did not alter current relaxations at similar concentrations.

Volume 24, Issue 3, pp. 449-457, 11/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics