MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sokolovsky, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sokolovsky, M.

Muscarinic receptor heterogeneity revealed by interaction with bretylium tosylate. Different ligand-receptor conformations versus different receptor subclasses

G Schreiber and M Sokolovsky

The interaction of the antiarrhythmic drug, bretylium tosylate, with the muscarinic receptor in tissue homogenates from regions of rat brain and heart and from submandibular gland and ileal wall was investigated. Competition binding experiments were carried out using the highly specific tritiated antagonist N-methyl-4-piperidyl benzilate. Bretylium displayed heterogeneous binding characteristics. The binding of the drug to neural and glandular preparations was found to be best fitted by a one-site model in each case. On the other hand, in the case of muscle preparations (heart and ileum), a two-site model yielded a significantly better fit for the binding data than that given by a single site model. High affinity sites for the drug were detected in the muscle tissue only, with equilibrium binding constants of 0.24 +/- 0.12, 0.97 +/- 0.27, and 0.57 +/- 0.41 microM for the atrium, ventricle, and ileum, respectively. The low affinity binding constants in the muscle tissues were similar (approximately 10 microM) to those in the neural and glandular tissues examined, namely, the cortex, the hippocampus, the medulla pons, and the submandibular gland. The drug had no effect on agonist-binding characteristics. The heterogeneous binding of bretylium is compared to that of another nonclassical antagonist, pirenzepine. The results are discussed in relation to two alternative hypotheses put forward to account for antagonist heterogeneity in binding, the one involving ligand-receptor conformations and the other receptor subclasses.

Volume 27, Issue 1, pp. 27-31, 01/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics