MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Glazer, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Glazer, R. I.

Comparison of the cellular and RNA-dependent effects of sangivamycin and toyocamycin in human colon carcinoma cells

MB Cohen and RI Glazer

The effects of the pyrrolopyrimidine antibiotics sangivamycin and toyocamycin on the synthesis of RNA and protein, ribosomal RNA processing, and cell viability were examined in colon carcinoma cell line HT-29. Exposure for 24 hr to toyocamycin caused an exponential type of cell lethality resulting in a 4-log reduction of cell viability, while sangivamycin produced a gradual and self-limiting type of cell lethality resulting in a 1-log reduction of cell viability. Toyocamycin, at a concentration of 1 microM produced total cessation of precursor rRNA processing, while 10 microM sangivamycin produced little or no effect on processing. On the contrary, sangivamycin caused a significant decrease in protein synthesis after 6 hr, while toyocamycin had less effect. The inhibition of protein synthesis by sangivamycin results from an inhibition of the formation of complexes essential to the initiation of protein synthesis. The results suggest that the mechanisms of action of these closely related agents are quite distinct. The marked loss of cell viability caused by toyocamycin correlates with its effect on rRNA processing, while the slow inhibition of protein synthesis appears to be secondary to the loss of ribosome synthesis. On the other hand, the lesser cytotoxicity produced by sangivamycin results from a more direct effect on protein synthesis. Importantly, cells are much less capable of resuming normal proliferative activity after 24 hr of impaired rRNA processing than after a similar interval of reduced protein synthesis.

Volume 27, Issue 3, pp. 349-355, 03/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Lee and M. Jung
The Nucleoside Analog Sangivamycin Induces Apoptotic Cell Death in Breast Carcinoma MCF7/Adriamycin-resistant Cells via Protein Kinase C{delta} and JNK Activation
J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2007; 282(20): 15271 - 15283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics