MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, L. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, L. T.

Effect of solubilization on the distinct binding properties of muscarine receptors from rabbit hippocampus and brainstem

DD Flynn and LT Potter

The binding of carbachol, quinuclidinyl benzilate, pirenzepine, and scopolamine to muscarine receptors from the rabbit hippocampus and brainstem was examined in membranes and in digitonin solution, in order to determine whether the dispersion of receptor molecules altered the distinct ligand-binding profiles of the receptors of these tissues. The modification of receptor-effector complexes showing high affinity for carbachol in membranes, with guanyl 5'-yl imidodiphosphate (GppNHp), N- ethyl-maleimide (NEM), and ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), did not remove receptor heterogeneity. In addition to receptor heterogeneity, GppNHp-sensitive high affinity agonist binding to membranes was NEM sensitive in the brainstem but NEM insensitive in the hippocampus. Solubilization with digitonin in the presence of Mn2+ ions yielded GppNHp-sensitive, high affinity agonist-binding complexes from the brainstem but not the hippocampus. More extensive dissociation was achieved with solubilization in EDTA and NEM, and resulted in receptor populations which showed markedly lower and slightly different affinities for carbachol. However, the selectivities and affinities for three antagonists were little changed in solution from those found in membranes. These results support the view that there are differences in muscarine receptors as well as different receptor complexes with guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins. The selective binding of carbachol appears largely dependent upon the association of receptors with other molecules, including effector molecules, whereas antagonists appear to recognize receptors irrespective of associated molecules.

Volume 30, Issue 3, pp. 193-199, 09/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics