MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D.

Differences in muscarinic receptor reserve for inhibition of adenylate cyclase and stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis in chick heart cells

JH Brown and D Goldstein

Carbachol is 100 times more potent for inhibiting cyclic AMP formation than for stimulating phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis in chick heart cells. To determine whether this reflects differences in agonist affinity of the receptor(s) coupled to the two responses, we measured these functional responses following removal of receptor reserve with propylbenzilycholine mustard (PrBCM). Conditions of PrBCM treatment that led to progressive loss of up to 95% of the [3H]-N- methylscopolamine-binding sites decreased the potency but not the maximal capacity of carbachol to inhibit cyclic AMP formation. In contrast, there was a marked decrease in the maximal PI response to carbachol. The KA for carbachol, calculated by measuring functional responses following receptor inactivation, was similar whether the cyclic AMP or the PI response was examined. These KA values (approximately 40 microM) were similar to the KD calculated by examining carbachol competition for [3H]-N-methylscopolamine-binding sites on the intact cell. PrBCM treatment also decreased the maximal effect of oxotremorine on cyclic AMP formation under conditions in which carbachol remained a full agonist for this response. We interpret our data as indicating that: there is much greater receptor reserve in the coupling of muscarinic receptors to adenylate cyclase than to PI hydrolysis; this, rather than differences in receptor affinity underlies the disparate dose-response relationships for the two responses; and differences in the effects of weak agonist on the two responses may also reflect differences in receptor reserve. We suggest that muscarinic receptors with the same affinity for carbachol interact with different efficiency with the transducers (Gi and Gx) that regulate adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C.

Volume 30, Issue 6, pp. 566-570, 12/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. Zhao, R. Bianchi, M. Wang, and R. K. S. Wong
Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Is Required for the Induction of Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Epileptiform Discharges
J. Neurosci., January 7, 2004; 24(1): 76 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. Zhang, L. Belardinelli, K. A. Jacobson, D. H. Otero, and S. P. Baker
Persistent Activation by and Receptor Reserve for an Irreversible A1-Adenosine Receptor Agonist in DDT1 MF-2 Cells and in Guinea Pig Heart
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 1997; 52(3): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A Ashkenazi, J. Winslow, E. Peralta, G. Peterson, M. Schimerlik, D. Capon, and J Ramachandran
An M2 muscarinic receptor subtype coupled to both adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositide turnover
Science, October 30, 1987; 238(4827): 672 - 675.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics