![]() |
|
|
i Protein Signaling in Clathrin-Coated Membrane Microdomains Containing GAIP
Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (E.E., T.F., I.N., T.H., T.M., M.G.F.) and Pathology (T.H., M.G.F.), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; and Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that bind to G
subunits and attenuate G protein signaling, but where these events occur in the cell is not yet established. Here we investigated, by immunofluorescence labeling and deconvolution analysis, the site at which endogenous G
-interacting protein (GAIP) (RGS19) binds to G
i3-YFP and its fate after activation of
-opioid receptor (DOR). In the absence of agonist, GAIP is spatially segregated from G
i3 and DOR in clathrin-coated domains (CCPs) of the cell membrane (PM), whereas G
i3-YPF and DOR are located in nonclathrin-coated microdomains of the PM. Upon addition of agonist, G
i3 partially colocalizes with GAIP in CCPs at the PM. When endocytosis is blocked by expression of a dynamin mutant [dyn(K44A)], there is a striking overlap in the distribution of DOR and G
i3-YFP with GAIP in CCPs. Moreover, G
i3-YFP and GAIP form a coprecipitable complex. Our results support a model whereby, after agonist addition, DOR and G
i3 move together into CCPs where G
i3 and GAIP meet and turn off G protein signaling. Subsequently, G
i3 returns to nonclathrin-coated microdomains of the PM, GAIP remains stably associated with CCPs, and DOR is internalized via clathrin-coated vesicles. This constitutes a novel mechanism for regulation of G
signaling through spatial segregation of a GAP in clathrin-coated pits.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Marilyn G. Farquhar, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0651. E-mail: mfarquhar{at}ucsd.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. Maurya and S. Subramaniam A Kinetic Model for Calcium Dynamics in RAW 264.7 Cells: 1. Mechanisms, Parameters, and Subpopulational Variability Biophys. J., August 1, 2007; 93(3): 709 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Varsano, M.-Q. Dong, I. Niesman, H. Gacula, X. Lou, T. Ma, J. R. Testa, J. R. Yates III, and M. G. Farquhar GIPC Is Recruited by APPL to Peripheral TrkA Endosomes and Regulates TrkA Trafficking and Signaling Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(23): 8942 - 8952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Le-Niculescu, I. Niesman, T. Fischer, L. DeVries, and M. G. Farquhar Identification and Characterization of GIV, a Novel G{alpha}i/s -interacting Protein Found on COPI, Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Transport Vesicles J. Biol. Chem., June 10, 2005; 280(23): 22012 - 22020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-x. Xie and P. P. Palmer RGS Proteins: New Players in the Field of Opioid Signaling and Tolerance Mechanisms Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 1034 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pineyro, M. Azzi, A. deLean, P. W. Schiller, and M. Bouvier Reciprocal Regulation of Agonist and Inverse Agonist Signaling Efficacy upon Short-Term Treatment of the Human {delta}-Opioid Receptor with an Inverse Agonist Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 336 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Bornheimer, M. R. Maurya, M. G. Farquhar, and S. Subramaniam Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction PNAS, November 9, 2004; 101(45): 15899 - 15904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jeanneteau, O. Guillin, J. Diaz, N. Griffon, and P. Sokoloff GIPC Recruits GAIP (RGS19) To Attenuate Dopamine D2 Receptor Signaling Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2004; 15(11): 4926 - 4937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||