MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on August 1, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.044610


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.107.044610v1
mol.107.044610v2
74/5/1193    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholls, D. J
Right arrow Articles by Mallinder, P. R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholls, D. J
Right arrow Articles by Mallinder, P. R


Received for publication December 21, 2007.
Revised July 18, 2008.
Accepted for publication August 1, 2008.

Identification of a Putative Intracellular Allosteric Antagonist Binding-Site in the CXC Chemokine Receptors 1 and 2

David J Nicholls 1*, Nick P Tomkinson 1, Katherine E Wiley 1, Anne Brammall 1, Lorna Bowers 1, Caroline Grahames 1, Alasdair Gaw 1, Premji Meghani 1, Philip Shelton 1, Tracy J Wright 2, Philip R Mallinder 1

1 AstraZeneca 2 AstraZeneca (now at GlaxoSmithkline)

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: david.nicholls{at}astrazeneca.com

Abstract

The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) implicated in mediating cellular functions associated with the inflammatory response. Potent CXCR2 receptor antagonists have been discovered, some of which have recently entered clinical development. The aim of this study was to identify key amino acid residue differences between CXCR1 and CXCR2 that influence the relative antagonism by two compounds which have markedly different chemical structures. By investigating the effects of domain switching and point mutations we found that the second extracellular loop, which contained significant amino acid sequence diversity, was not important for compound antagonism. Surprisingly, switching the intracellular C-terminal 60 amino acid domains of CXCR1 and CXCR2 caused an apparent reversal of antagonism at these two receptors. Further investigation showed that a single amino acid residue, lysine 320 in CXCR2 and asparagine 311 in CXCR1, plays a predominant role in describing the relative antagonism of the two compounds. Homology modeling studies based on the structure of bovine rhodopsin indicated a potential intracellular antagonist binding pocket involving lysine 320. We conclude that residue 320 in CXCR2 forms part of a potential allosteric binding pocket on the intracellular side of the receptor, a site that is distal to the orthosteric site commonly assumed to be the location of antagonist binding to GPCRs. The existence of a common intracellular allosteric binding site at GPCRs related to CXCR2 may be of value in the design of novel antagonists for therapeutic intervention.


Key words: Chemotactic peptides, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics