MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on July 15, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.049676


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.108.049676v1
74/4/1008    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benned-Jensen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkilde, M. M
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benned-Jensen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkilde, M. M


Received for publication June 13, 2008.
Revised July 14, 2008.
Accepted for publication July 15, 2008.

Structural motifs of importance for the constitutive activity of the orphan 7TM receptor EBI2 - Analysis of receptor activation in the absence of an agonist

Tau Benned-Jensen 1 Mette M Rosenkilde 1*

1 Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: rosenkilde{at}molpharm.dk

Abstract

The Epstein-Barr induced receptor 2 (EBI2) is a lymphocyte-expressed orphan 7TM receptor, that signals constitutively through G{alpha}i as shown for instance by GTP{gamma}S incorporation. Two regions of importance for the constitutive activity were identified by a systematic mutational analysis of 29 residues in EBI2. The CREB-transcription factor was used as a measure of receptor activity, and was correlated to the receptor surface expression. PheVI:13 (Phe257), and the neighbouring CysVI:12 (Cys256), in the conserved CW/FxP motif in TM-6, acted as negative regulators as Ala substitutions at these positions increased the constitutive activity 5.7 and 2.3 fold, respectively, compared to EBI2 wildtype (wt). In contrast, ArgII:20 (Arg87) in TM-2 acted as a positive regulator, as substitution to Ala, but not to Lys, decreased the constitutive activity more than 7 fold compared to wt EBI2. IleIII:03 (Ile106) is located only 4Å from ArgII:20, and a favourable electrostatic interaction with ArgII:20 was created by introduction of Glu in III:03 as the activity increased to 4.4 fold of wt EBI2. Importantly, swapping these charges by introduction of Glu in II:20 and Arg in III:03, resulted in a 2.7-fold increase compared to wt EBI2, and thereby rescued the two signaling-deficient single-mutations, that exhibited a 3.8- to 4.5-fold decrease in constitutive activity. The uncovering of these molecular mechanisms for EBI2 activation is important from a drug development point-of-view, as it may facilitate the rational design and development of small-molecule inverse agonists against EBI2 of putative importance as antiviral- or immune modulatory therapy.


Key words: Orphan, Gi family, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Func. analysis receptor/ion channel mutants, Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics