|
|
|
|
Vol. 63, Issue 4, 799-807, April 2003
Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Cell and Developmental Biology (J.Z.) and Department of Cell Biology (J.Z., H.C.J.), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Mumbai, India (K.G., D.P.); Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research (S.A., R.C.) and Department of Chemistry (R.A.), University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Noscapine, a microtubule-interfering agent, has been shown to arrest mitosis, to induce apoptosis, and to have potent antitumor activity. We report herein that two brominated derivatives of noscapine, 5-bromonoscapine (5-Br-nosc) and reduced 5-bromonoscapine (Rd 5-Br-nosc), have higher tubulin binding activity than noscapine and affect tubulin polymerization differently from noscapine. In addition, they are able to arrest cell cycle progression at mitosis at concentrations much lower than noscapine. Interestingly, whereas noscapine-arrested cells have nearly normal bipolar spindles, cells arrested by 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc form multipolar spindles. Nevertheless, noscapine and the two derivatives all affect the attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules and they impair the tension across paired kinetochores to similar degrees. 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc are also more active than noscapine in inhibiting the proliferation of various human cancer cells, including those that are resistant to paclitaxel and epothilone. Our results thus indicate a great potential for the use of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc both as biological tools for studying microtubule-mediated processes and as chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of human cancers.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microtubules
are helical polymers assembled from the heterodimer of
- and
-tubulin. They play important roles in shaping cells and directing
intracellular motility. During cell division, microtubules form a
bipolar apparatus called the mitotic spindle, which mediates chromosome
distribution into two daughter cells (McIntosh, 1994
). Microtubules are
intrinsically dynamic and they alternate abruptly and stochastically
between periods of growth and shortening. The dynamic nature is crucial
for the organization and function of microtubules, especially for
spindle morphogenesis and chromosome movement during mitosis (Desai and
Mitchison, 1997
). Eukaryotic cells have evolved a surveillance
mechanism called the spindle assembly checkpoint, which blocks cell
cycle progression at mitosis when the spindle has a defect or when
chromosomes are not properly aligned at the equatorial plane (Zhou et
al., 2002d
). Not surprisingly, chemical compounds that target
microtubules can arrest cells at mitosis, a property attributed to the
use of microtubule-interfering agents in cancer chemotherapy (van Tellingen et al., 1992
; Rowinsky, 1997
; Crown and O'Leary, 2000
).
There are two classes of microtubule-interfering agents: those that
inhibit microtubule polymerization (such as colchicine, nocodazole, and
the vinca alkaloids) and those that promote microtubule polymerization,
such as the taxoids and epothilone (Jordan and Wilson, 1999
). It is now
clear that although all of these agents can efficiently block cell
cycle progression, only a select few have been used clinically for the
treatment of human cancers. In addition, there are differences
regarding the toxicity and the efficacy of these antimicrotubule agents
for distinct classes of tumors. Even for drugs that are currently in
clinical use (e.g., paclitaxel and vinblastine), although patients have
impressive initial response, many of them relapse after treatment
because of the development of drug resistance. Thus, the development of more potent and selective antimicrotubule drugs are greatly needed, especially for the treatment of human cancers resistant to currently used drugs.
We have recently identified noscapine (Fig.
1A), a phthalideisoquinoline alkaloid
from opium, as a microtubule-interfering agent that binds
stoichiometrically to tubulin and alters tubulin conformation (Ye et
al., 1998
). Like many other antimicrotubule agents, noscapine
suppresses the dynamics of microtubule assembly, blocks cell cycle
progression at mitosis, and then causes apoptotic cell death in many
cancer cell types (Ye et al., 1998
, 2001
; Zhou et al., 2002a
, 2002b
).
Noscapine inhibits the progression of murine lymphoma, melanoma, and
human breast tumors implanted in nude mice with little or no toxicity
to the kidney, heart, liver, bone marrow, spleen, or small intestine
and does not inhibit primary humoral immune responses in mice (Ye et
al., 1998
; Ke et al., 2000
; Landen et al., 2002
). The water solubility
and feasibility for oral administration are also very valuable
advantages of noscapine over many other antimicrotubule drugs
(Dahlstrom et al., 1982
; Haikala et al., 1986
; Karlsson et al., 1990
).
In this study, we demonstrate that two brominated noscapine
derivatives, 5-bromonoscapine (5-Br-nosc; Fig. 1D) and reduced
5-bromonoscapine (Rd 5-Br-nosc; Fig. 1G), are more potent
microtubule-interfering agents that arrest mitosis and inhibit cell
proliferation with much higher efficiency than noscapine.
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
Goat brain microtubule proteins were isolated in
the presence of 1 M glutamate by two cycles of polymerization and
depolymerization (Hamel and Lin, 1981
). Tubulin was purified from the
microtubule proteins by phosphocellulose chromatography as described
previously (Panda et al., 2000
; Joshi and Zhou, 2001
), and the
concentration of tubulin was determined by the method of Bradford
(1976)
using bovine serum albumin as a standard. The tubulin solution
was stored at
80°C until future use. Paclitaxel and nocodazole were
purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and noscapine (97% purity) was
from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI).
Preparation of Brominated Derivatives of Noscapine.
5-Br-nosc
(1,3-dihydro-4,5-dimethoxy-1-[1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-bromo-8-methoxy-2-methyl-6,7-methylendioxy-isoquinolyl-1]isobenzofuran-3-one) and Rd 5-Br-nosc
(1,3-dihydro-4,5-dimethoxy-1-[1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-bromo-8-meth-oxy-2-methyl-6,7-methylendioxy-isoquinolyl-1]isobenzofuran) were prepared as described previously with minor modifications (Dey and
Srinivasan, 1935
). Briefly, noscapine was dissolved in 48% HBr
solution, and Br2/H2O was
added to this solution until no semisolid precipitate formed. The
supernatant liquid was decanted to another flask, and
NH3 solution was added to the semisolid precipitate to form solid precipitate. The supernatant liquid was also
neutralized to pH 10 to form solid precipitate. The two solid
precipitates were combined and recrystallized with ethanol to produce
5-Br-nosc. Yield, 75%; melting point; 169 to 170°C; calculated
percentage (found percentage), C, 53.67 (53.62); H, 4.50 (4.44); N,
2.85 (2.71). IR, 2945 (m), 2800 (m), 1759 (s), 1612 (m), 1500 (s), 1443 (s), 1263 (s), 1091 (s), 933 (w) cm
1.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz),
7.04 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (s,
2H), 5.51(d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (s,
3H), 3.98 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 2.52 (s, 3H), 2.8 to 1.93 (m, 4H).
Mass spectrometry: fast atom bombardment ions,
m/z (relative abundance percentage), 494 (93.8),
492 (100), 300 (30.5), 298 (35.4); matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization ions, m/z 491.37 (M)+, 493.34; electrospray ionization/tandem mass
spectrometry, parent ion masses, 494, 492; daughter ion masses
(intensity, percentage): 433 (51), 431 (37), 300 (100), 298 (93.3). Rd
5-Br-nosc was prepared by using the same procedure as for 5-Br-nosc,
except that the reduced form of noscapine was used as the starting
material. Yield, 70%; melting point, 113 to 114°C; calculated
percentage (found percentage), C, 55.24 (55.19); H, 5.05 (5.25); N,
2.93 (2.88). 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 M Hz),
6.73 (d, J = 8Hz, 1H), 6.11 (d, J = 8Hz, 1H),
6.08 (s, 2H), 5.78 (s, 2H), 5.33 (dd, J = 12Hz, 1H), 5.05 (dd,
J = 12Hz, 1H), 4.90 (s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 6H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.42 to
3.19 (m, 2H), 2.99 (s, 3H), 2.82 to 2.80 (m, 2H). Infrared, 2950 (m),
2852 (m), 1635 (w), 1616 (m), 1450 (s), 1267 (s), 1226 (s), 1078 (s),
1035 (s) cm
1. Mass spectrometry: fast atom
bombardment ions, m/z (relative abundance %):
480 (100), 478 (100), 462 (8), 460 (8.3), 300 (18), 298 (19), 179 (12.5); matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization ions,
m/z 478.5 (M)+, 480.5;
electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry, parent ion mass: 480, 478; daughter ion masses (intensity, percentage): 462 (74), 460 (52.5),
447 (21), 445 (16.6), 431 (83.3), 429 (66.6), 300 (79), 298 (74.7), 193 (11), 191 (23.5), 179 (100).
Cell Culture.
HeLa cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) [the
medium and serum were both purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), as
were the following media and sera]. MCF-7, DU 145, and Caco-2 cells were grown in Eagle's minimum essential medium supplemented with 10%
FBS and nonessential amino acids. Ca Ski, 1A9, 1A9/PTX10, 1A9/PTX22,
1A9/A8, and A2780/AD10 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% FBS. SigC and T84 cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 (1:1) medium supplemented with 10% FBS. SK-OV-3 cells were grown in McCoy's 5a
medium supplemented with 10% FBS, and MDA-MB-231 cells were grown in
L-15 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. All cells were grown as
monolayers in tissue culture plates or on glass coverslips at 37°C in
a 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere. The 1A9 cell line
is a clone of the human ovarian carcinoma cell line A2780. The two paclitaxel-resistant cell lines 1A9/PTX10 and 1A9/PTX22 and the epothilone-resistant cell line 1A9/A8 were derived from 1A9 as described previously (Giannakakou et al., 1997
, 2000
). The
multidrug-resistant cell line A2780/AD10 was also derived from A2780
(Pryor et al., 2002
).
Tubulin Binding Assay.
Fluorescence titration for
determining the tubulin binding parameters was performed as described
previously (Peyrot et al., 1992
). In brief, noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and
Rd 5-Br-nosc (0-100 µM) were incubated with 2 µM tubulin in 25 mM
PIPES, pH 6.8, 3 mM MgSO4, and 1 mM EGTA for 45 min at 37°C. The relative intrinsic fluorescence intensity of tubulin
was then monitored in a JASCO FP-6500 spectrofluorometer (JASCO, Tokyo,
Japan) using a cuvette of 0.3-cm path length, and the excitation
wavelength was 295 nm. The fluorescence emission intensity of noscapine
and its derivatives at this excitation wavelength was negligible. A
0.3-cm path-length cuvette was used to minimize the inner filter
effects caused by the absorbance of these agents at higher
concentration ranges. In addition, the inner filter effects were
corrected using a formula Fcorrected = Fobserved·antilog
[(Aex + Aem)/2], where
Aex is the absorbance at the
excitation wavelength and Aem is the absorbance at the emission wavelength. The dissociation constant (Kd) was determined by the formula:
1/B = Kd/[free
ligand] + 1, where B is the fractional occupancy and [free
ligand] is the concentration of free noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, or Rd
5-Br-nosc. The fractional occupancy (B) was determined by
the formula B =
F/
Fmax, where
F is the change in fluorescence intensity when tubulin
and its ligand are in equilibrium and
Fmax is the value of maximum
fluorescence change when tubulin is completely bound with its ligand.
Fmax was calculated by plotting
1/
F versus 1/liter using total ligand concentration as
the first estimate of free ligand concentration.
Tubulin Polymerization Assay. Spectrophotometer cuvettes (0.4-cm path length) held a solution consisting of microtubule assembly buffer (100 mM PIPES, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM GTP, pH 6.8) and 10 or 100 µM noscapine, 10 or 100 µM 5-Br-nosc, 10 or 100 µM Rd 5-Br-nosc, 10 µM paclitaxel, 10 µM nocodazole, or the solvent DMSO. Cuvettes were kept at room temperature before the addition of 10 µM purified tubulin and shifted to 37°C in a temperature controlled Ultrospec 3000 spectrophotometer (Pharmacia Biotech, Cambridge, UK). The assembly was monitored by measuring the changes in absorbance (350 nm) at 0.5-min intervals.
Measurement of Insoluble and Soluble Tubulin.
Cells were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and soluble proteins were
then extracted under conditions that prevent microtubule
depolymerization (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 M
N-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid, pH 6.75, 1 mM
MgSO4, 2 mM EGTA, 4 M glycerol). The remaining cytoskeletal fraction in the culture dish was dissolved in 0.5 ml of
0.5% SDS in 25 mM Tris, pH 6.8. Total protein concentration was then
determined in each fraction by BCA reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Equivalent amounts for each treatment group were loaded for
SDS/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins were then
electrophoretically transferred for Western blot analysis using a mouse
monoclonal anti-
-tubulin antibody (DM1A; Sigma) and a horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Jackson
ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Tubulin bands were visualized using
enhanced chemiluminescence following the manufacturer's instructions
(Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), and their relative levels were
determined by densitometric analysis using a Lynx video densitometer
(Biological Vision Inc., San Mateo, CA).
Flow Cytometric Analysis.
The flow cytometric evaluation of
the cell cycle status was performed as described previously (Zhou et
al., 2002b
). Briefly, 2 × 106 HeLa cells
were centrifuged, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and fixed in 70%
ethanol. Tubes containing the cell pellets were stored at
20°C for
at least 24 h. After this, the cells were centrifuged at
1000g for 10 min and the supernatant was discarded. The
pellets were resuspended in 30 µl of phosphate/citrate buffer (0.2 M
Na2HPO4/0.1 M citric acid,
pH 7.5) at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were then washed with 5 ml of PBS and incubated with propidium iodide (PI, 20 µg/ml)/RNase A
(20 µg/ml) in PBS for 30 min. Samples were analyzed on a Coulter
Elite flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).
Immunofluorescence Microscopy.
Cells were grown on
poly(L-lysine)-coated glass coverslips for
immunofluorescence microscopy as described previously (Zhou et al.,
2002b
, 2002c
). To visualize microtubules, cells were fixed with
methanol for 5 min at
20°C, processed with a mouse monoclonal anti-
-tubulin antibody (DM1A diluted 1000-fold, Sigma) followed by a
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (diluted 100-fold; Jackson ImmunoResearch). Cells were stained
with PI (0.5 µg/ml) for 30 s at room temperature to visualize DNA. Coverslips were mounted with AquaMount (Lerner Laboratories, Pittsburgh, CA) containing 0.01% 1,4-diazobicyclo(2,2,2)octane (Sigma)
and examined with a Zeiss Axiovert 135 fluorescence microscope using
100×/1.3 numerical aperture oil lens (Plan-Neofluar; Carl Zeiss Inc.,
Thornwood, NY). To visualize Mad2, cells were fixed with 1%
paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature, permeabilized
with 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 2 min, and then incubated with a rabbit
polyclonal anti-Mad2 antibody (a kind gift from Dr. E. D. Salmon,
University of North Carolina, diluted 200-fold) followed by a
FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (diluted 100-fold,
Jackson ImmunoResearch). Cells were then counterstained with PI,
mounted, and examined as described above.
Measurement of Sister Kinetochore Distance.
Cells grown on
poly(L-lysine)-coated glass coverslips were fixed with 2%
paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS, and
then incubated with a mouse monoclonal anti-
-tubulin antibody (DM1A
diluted 1000-fold; Sigma) and a human serum that recognizes
kinetochores (diluted 1000-fold; a generous gift from Dr. K. F. Sullivan, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). Cells were then
incubated with rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse and FITC-conjugated
anti-human secondary antibodies (both diluted 100-fold; Jackson
ImmunoResearch) and mounted as described above. All images were taken
from the stacks of 12-bit confocal images using the LSM510 imaging
software (Carl Zeiss), and the center-to-center distance between paired
kinetochores was measured as described previously (Zhou et al., 2002b
).
When sister kinetochores were in the same focal plane, the real
distance between them (d) equals the measured distance
(y). When sister kinetochores were not in the same focal
plane, the real distance between them (d) was corrected by
triangulation of the measured distance (y) and the
z-axis distance (z) between two focal planes
containing the brightest staining for each of the two sister
kinetochores (d2 = y2 + z2).
In Vitro Cell Proliferation Assay.
The cell proliferation
assay was performed in 96-well plates as described previously (Skehan
et al., 1990
; Zhou et al., 2002a
). In brief, 2 × 103 cells were seeded in each well and incubated
with gradient concentrations of noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, or Rd 5-Br-nosc
for 72 h. The cells were then fixed with 50% trichloroacetic acid
and stained with 0.4% sulforhodamine B dissolved in 1% acetic acid.
The cells were then washed with 1% acetic acid to remove unbound dye.
The protein-bound dye was extracted with 10 mM Tris base to determine
the optical density at 564-nm wavelength using a SPECTRAmax PLUS 384 microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc Have Higher Tubulin Binding Activity
than Noscapine.
Tubulin, like many other proteins, contains
considerable aromatic amino acids, such as tryptophan, giving tubulin
an intrinsic fluorescence. Tubulin-binding agents typically quench the
fluorescence emission spectrum of tubulin in a concentration-dependent
manner (Peyrot et al., 1992
; Panda et al., 1997
; Ye et al., 1998
). This provides a basis for using the fluorescence titration method to determine the dissociation constant
(Kd) between tubulin and its binding
agents. We found that noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc all
quenched tubulin fluorescence in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
1, B, E, and H). The dissociation constant
(Kd) was determined by the formula:
1/B = Kd/[free
ligand] + 1, where B is the fractional occupancy, and
[free ligand] is the concentration of free noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, or
Rd 5-Br-nosc (Fig. 1, C, F, and I). This analysis gave a dissociation
constant (Kd) of 144 ± 2.8 µM
for noscapine binding to tubulin, 54 ± 9.1 µM for 5-Br-nosc binding to tubulin, and 106 ± 4.2 µM for Rd 5-Br-nosc binding to tubulin. These results thus indicate that 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc
have higher tubulin binding activity than noscapine. We also examined
the tubulin binding activity of reduced noscapine as a control for Rd
5-Br-nosc and could not obtain a dissociation constant because the
effect of reduced noscapine on tubulin fluorescence was minimal (data
not shown).
Effects of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc on the Assembly of Tubulin
Subunits.
We have previously shown that noscapine, although
binding to tubulin, does not significantly promote or inhibit
microtubule polymerization, even at a concentration as high as 100 µM; instead, it alters the steady-state dynamics of microtubule
assembly primarily by increasing the amount of time that the
microtubules spend in an attenuated (pause) state (Zhou et al., 2002b
).
This unique property of noscapine has led to its successful use in
exploring the role of microtubule dynamics during the spindle assembly
checkpoint signaling (Zhou et al., 2002b
). In this study, we examined
the effects of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc on the assembly of tubulin subunits into microtubules in vitro by measuring the changes in the
turbidity produced upon tubulin polymerization (Fig.
2). As expected, 10 µM paclitaxel
strongly promoted tubulin polymerization into microtubules, and 10 µM
nocodazole strongly inhibited tubulin polymerization (Fig. 2). In
addition, consistent with our previous observation (Zhou et al.,
2002b
), 10 or 100 µM noscapine did not have a significant effect on
tubulin polymerization. 10 µM 5-Br-nosc or Rd 5-Br-nosc did not have
a significant effect on tubulin polymerization, either. However, at 100 µM, both 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc inhibited tubulin polymerization,
although the effect of Rd 5-Br-nosc was not as obvious as that of
5-Br-nosc (Fig. 2).
|
Effects of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc on the Cellular Levels of
Insoluble versus Soluble Tubulin.
To test the effects of 5-Br-nosc
and Rd 5-Br-nosc on tubulin polymerization in cells, we prepared cell
extracts that contains insoluble and soluble tubulin, respectively,
from HeLa cells treated with these agents (Fig.
3). An equivalent amount of the solvent DMSO was used as a control, and 10 or 100 µM noscapine, 10 µM paclitaxel, and 10 µM nocodazole were also used as comparisons. We
found that the percentage of insoluble tubulin in cells treated with
the solvent DMSO was 61.5% (control, Fig. 3). For cells treated with
10 µM paclitaxel, 99.2% of tubulin was in the insoluble form, and
for those cells treated with 10 µM nocodazole, only 9.8% of the
tubulin was insoluble (Fig. 3). However, the percentage of insoluble
tubulin in cells treated with 10, 100 µM noscapine, 10 µM
5-Br-nosc, and 10 µM Rd 5-Br-nosc was 60.5, 59.8, 60.2, and 60.9%,
respectively, which were very similar to that in the control cells
(Fig. 3). Consistent with the inhibitory effect of high-dose 5-Br-nosc
on tubulin polymerization (Fig. 2), the percentage of insoluble tubulin
in cells treated with 100 µM 5-Br-nosc was 37.6%. In contrast, the
percentage of insoluble tubulin in 100 µM Rd 5-Br-nosc treated cells
was 59.7%, which was only slightly lower than that in the control
cells (Fig. 3).
|
5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc Are More Active than Noscapine in
Arresting Mitosis.
Because all known microtubule-interfering
agents, including noscapine (Ye et al., 1998
, 2001
; Zhou et al., 2002b
,
2002a
), are able to arrest mitosis in mammalian cells (Jordan and
Wilson, 1999
), we examined the effects of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc on cell cycle progression and compared with the effect of noscapine. We
used HeLa cells because they are known to have a tight spindle assembly
checkpoint (Skoufias et al., 2001
; Zhou et al., 2002b
). We found that
the percentage of mitotic cells (the mitotic index) was increased in a
concentration-dependent manner upon treatment with noscapine,
5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc for 24 h (Fig.
4A). The concentration needed to arrest
50% of HeLa cells at mitosis was 18.4 µM for noscapine, as
determined by the curve of mitotic index versus drug concentration. In
contrast, only 7.7 and 3.6 µM were required, respectively, for
5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc to arrest 50% of cells at mitosis (Fig.
4A), indicating that they are more active than noscapine in arresting
mitosis. The higher activity of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc in arresting
mitosis was further confirmed by flow cytometric analysis of DNA
content. For example, the fraction of cells in
G2/M, which have duplicated (4N) DNA content, was
15.2, 51.8, and 72.7%, respectively, upon treatment with 6.4 µM
noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc for 24 h (Fig. 4B).
|
Impairment of Chromosome Attachment to Kinetochore Microtubules by
Noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc.
The abnormal spindle
morphology in cells arrested by noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc
suggested that the attachment of chromosomes to kinetochore
microtubules might be disrupted. To test this, we examined the
localization patterns of Mad2, a spindle assembly checkpoint protein
known to be essential for sensing the attachment of chromosomes to
kinetochore microtubules in human cells (Li and Benezra, 1996
). In
prometaphase, Mad2 was localized to the kinetochore region, whereas in
metaphase, it was no longer detectable at kinetochores (Fig.
5). In noscapine-arrested mitotic cells,
Mad2 was present at the kinetochores on chromosomes that were near the
spindle poles but was not detectable on chromosomes aligned at the
equatorial plane (Fig. 5; also see Zhou et al., 2002b
). In cells
arrested by 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc, Mad2 signal could be seen at
the kinetochores on most chromosomes (Fig. 5). These results indicate
that noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc disrupt the attachment of
chromosomes to kinetochore microtubules.
|
Comparable Impairment of Kinetochore Tension by Noscapine,
5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc.
When the sister chromatids become
attached to kinetochore microtubules from two opposite spindle poles,
tension develops across the sister kinetochores because of the mitotic
force that tends to pull the chromatids toward two opposite spindle
poles against the glue (cohesin) that holds the sister chromatids
together (Mitchison and Salmon, 1992
; Rieder and Salmon, 1994
; Nicklas,
1997
). The tension across sister kinetochores, apparent as a visible
increase in the distance between them, is believed to be crucial for
the spindle assembly checkpoint signaling in organisms from yeast to
humans (Nicklas, 1997
; Zhou et al., 2002d
). We thus asked whether the
spindle defects caused by noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc were
associated with impaired kinetochore tension.
|
5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc Are More Potent than Noscapine in
Inhibiting the Proliferation of Human Cancer Cells.
We then
performed in vitro cell proliferation assays to examine the effects of
noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc on the proliferation of a series
of human cancer cell lines. They included human breast cancer cell
lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, cervical cancer cell lines HeLa and Ca Ski,
colon cancer cell lines Caco-2 and T84, ovarian cancer cell lines
SK-OV-3 and SigC, and a prostate cancer cell line, DU 145 (Fig.
7A). We found that 5-Br-nosc and Rd
5-Br-nosc inhibited the proliferation of these human cancer cell lines
more efficiently than noscapine, as reflected by the much lower
IC50 values, the drug concentrations needed to
prevent cell proliferation by 50% (Fig. 7A). For example, the
IC50 values of noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd
5-Br-nosc were 33.4 ± 3.7, 5.8 ± 1.1, and 3.8 ± 0.5 µM, respectively for MCF-7 cells, and 34.8 ± 3.1, 3.9 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 0.7 µM, respectively for DU 145 cells (Fig. 7A).
The significantly lower IC50 values suggest that
5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc are more potent than noscapine in inhibiting the proliferation of human cancer cells.
|
-tubulin mutations that
confer resistance to paclitaxel or epothilone (Giannakakou et al.,
1997| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microtubule-interfering agents have played an important role in
early experiments studying the basic mechanisms of mitosis. This is
primarily because of their ability to interfere with spindle microtubules and halt cell cycle progression at mitosis. In fact, the
subunit of microtubules, tubulin, was first identified as a
high-affinity colchicine receptor located on the mitotic apparatus (Weisenberg et al., 1968
). In addition, the major components involved in the spindle assembly checkpoint were identified in budding yeast for
mutants that fail to arrest in mitosis in the presence of
microtubule-interfering agents (Li and Murray, 1991
; Hoyt et al.,
1991
). We have recently found that noscapine is a unique antimicrotubule agent that alters microtubule dynamics without affecting the total polymer mass of tubulin and have successfully used
it in probing the spindle assembly checkpoint mechanisms (Zhou et al.,
2002b
). In this study, we demonstrate that two brominated derivatives
of noscapine, 5-Br-nosc and reduced Rd 5-Br-nosc, have higher tubulin
binding activity than noscapine and affect tubulin polymerization
differently from noscapine. To facilitate the use of 5-Br-nosc and Rd
5-Br-nosc in studying mitotic processes, it will be of great importance
to investigate their effects on the dynamic instability parameters of
microtubule assembly.
In this study, we demonstrate that 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc are able
to arrest cell cycle progression at mitosis at concentrations much
lower than noscapine. In addition, although noscapine-arrested cells
have nearly normal bipolar spindles, cells arrested by 5-Br-nosc and Rd
5-Br-nosc form multipolar spindles. The multipolar spindle morphology
is intriguing, because it suggests that 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc
might also affect the centrosome, which tethers the minus ends of
spindle microtubules and is critical for spindle morphogenesis in most
cells. We show that the inhibitory effect of 5-Br-nosc on tubulin
polymerization is greater than that of Rd 5-Br-nosc. However, Rd
5-Br-nosc is in turn more active than 5-Br-nosc in arresting mitosis
and inhibiting cell proliferation. These results thus support the
hypothesis that the mechanisms by which microtubule-interfering agents
arrest cells at mitosis and inhibit cell proliferation might lie in the
suppression of spindle microtubule dynamics instead of their action on
microtubule polymerization or depolymerization (Wilson and Jordan,
1995
).
The spindle assembly checkpoint, as a molecular safeguard, is essential
for faithful transmission of chromosomes during mitosis. The spindle
assembly checkpoint examines whether prerequisites for chromosome
segregation have been satisfied and thereby determines whether to
execute or to delay chromosome segregation (Zhou et al., 2002d
). Only
when all the chromosomes are attached by kinetochore microtubules from
two opposite poles and proper tension is placed on the paired
kinetochores does anaphase take place, allowing the physical splitting
of sister chromatids. Microtubule-interfering agents, although acting
on microtubules with different mechanisms, all disrupt microtubule
dynamics (Jordan and Wilson, 1999
), which may affect both the
attachment of chromosomes to kinetochore microtubules and the tension
exerted on kinetochore. It is thus not surprising that all the known
microtubule-interfering agents are able to halt mitotic progression by
activating the spindle assembly checkpoint (Jordan and Wilson, 1999
).
Consistently, noscapine, 5-Br-nosc, and Rd 5-Br-nosc act on tubulin
differently and cause distinct spindle defects; however, they all
affect chromosome attachment to kinetochore microtubules, as indicated
by localization of Mad2 at the kinetochore region. In addition, they
impair kinetochore tension to similar degrees, as indicated by similar
extents of reduction in the distance between sister kinetochores. The
potential of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc as biological tools for
studying mitotic processes thus merits thorough evaluation.
Microtubule-interfering agents, such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, and the
vinca alkaloids, have proven effective for chemotherapeutic management
of human cancers (van Tellingen et al., 1992
; Rowinsky, 1997
; Crown and
O'Leary, 2000
). Unfortunately, these microtubule drugs produce a
variety of side effects (Rowinsky, 1997
). This is mainly because
microtubules perform many other functions, such as cytoplasmic
organization and axonal transport, besides their function in chromosome
movement during mitosis. In addition, the clinical use of the taxoids
and vinca alkaloids has been limited by the development of drug
resistance contributed by P-glycoprotein overexpression (Gottesman and
Pastan, 1993
; Bradley and Ling, 1994
), altered expression of tubulin
isotypes (Burkhart et al., 2001
), and other unknown mechanisms. We show
that 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc are more potent than noscapine in
inhibiting the proliferation of a series of human breast, cervical,
colon, ovarian, and prostate cancer cells. Moreover, these two
brominated derivatives are also more potent than noscapine in
inhibiting the proliferation of human ovarian cancer cells resistant to
paclitaxel and epothilone. These findings thus indicate a great
potential for the use of 5-Br-nosc and Rd 5-Br-nosc as chemotherapeutic
agents for the treatment of human cancers, especially for those that
are resistant to currently used microtubule drugs.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Drs. Edward D. Salmon and Kevin F. Sullivan for antibodies and Drs. Paraskevi Giannakakou, Rajeshwar R. Tekmal, Asma Nusrat, Robert L. Orlawski, and Ronald L. Heimark for cell lines. We also thank Drs. Ernest Hamel, Paraskevi Giannakakou, Dennis C. Liotta, James P. Snyder, and Mr. James H. Nettles for discussions. We are indebted to the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript for helpful suggestions.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 11, 2002; Accepted December 16, 2002
This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (to H.C.J.) and from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (to D.P.).
Address correspondence to: Dr. Harish C. Joshi, Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail: joshi{at}cellbio.emory.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
5-Br-nosc, 5-bromonoscapine; Rd 5-Br-nosc, reduced 5-bromonoscapine; FBS, fetal bovine serum; PIPES, piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid); PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PI, propidium iodide; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tubulins that exhibit impaired paclitaxel-driven polymerization.
J Biol Chem
272:
17118-17125
taking aim at a moving target.
Chem Biol
2:
569-573[CrossRef][Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Aneja, M. Liu, C. Yates, J. Gao, X. Dong, B. Zhou, S. N. Vangapandu, J. Zhou, and H. C. Joshi Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein-Overexpressing Teniposide-Resistant Human Lymphomas Undergo Apoptosis by a Tubulin-Binding Agent Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1495 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aneja, V. Kalia, R. Ahmed, and H. C. Joshi Nonimmunosuppressive chemotherapy: EM011-treated mice mount normal T-cell responses to an acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2007; 6(11): 2891 - 2899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aneja, A. M. Ghaleb, J. Zhou, V. W. Yang, and H. C. Joshi p53 and p21 Determine the Sensitivity of Noscapine-Induced Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cells Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3862 - 3870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aneja, J. Zhou, B. Zhou, R. Chandra, and H. C. Joshi Treatment of hormone-refractory breast cancer: apoptosis and regression of human tumors implanted in mice. Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2006; 5(9): 2366 - 2377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aneja, S. N. Vangapandu, M. Lopus, R. Chandra, D. Panda, and H. C. Joshi Development of a Novel Nitro-Derivative of Noscapine for the Potential Treatment of Drug-Resistant Ovarian Cancer and T-Cell Lymphoma Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 1801 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aneja, M. Lopus, J. Zhou, S. N. Vangapandu, A. Ghaleb, J. Yao, J. H. Nettles, B. Zhou, M. Gupta, D. Panda, et al. Rational Design of the Microtubule-Targeting Anti-Breast Cancer Drug EM015. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3782 - 3791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aneja, J. Zhou, S. N. Vangapandu, B. Zhou, R. Chandra, and H. C. Joshi Drug-resistant T-lymphoid tumors undergo apoptosis selectively in response to an antimicrotubule agent, EM011 Blood, March 15, 2006; 107(6): 2486 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhou, M. Liu, R. Aneja, R. Chandra, H. Lage, and H. C. Joshi Reversal of P-glycoprotein-Mediated Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Cells by the c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 445 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gokmen-Polar, D. Escuin, C. D. Walls, S. E. Soule, Y. Wang, K. L. Sanders, T. M. LaVallee, M. Wang, B. D. Guenther, P. Giannakakou, et al. {beta}-Tubulin Mutations Are Associated with Resistance to 2-Methoxyestradiol in MDA-MB-435 Cancer Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9406 - 9414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhou, A. O'Brate, A. Zelnak, and P. Giannakakou Survivin Deregulation in {beta}-Tubulin Mutant Ovarian Cancer Cells Underlies Their Compromised Mitotic Response to Taxol Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 64(23): 8708 - 8714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||