|
|
|
|
Institut für Toxikologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany (R.G., I.J.); IPF PharmaCeuticals GmbH, Hannover, Germany (H.J.); Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (K.A.)
Received November 8, 2002; accepted February 28, 2003
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B was
suggested to be responsible for its decreased binding to DNA
(Oda et al., 2000
The ability of PAO to cross-link cysteinyl residues of any protein, if
these residues are exposed at the surface of the molecule, makes PAO a less
specific agent. For its usage as specific PTPase inhibitor in cellular
processes, it is necessary to meet a well-defined concentration. In some
studies, PAO was applied as a specific PTPase inhibitor to examine the
participation of tyrosine phosphorylation in cell adhesion and in the
regulation of tight junctions, respectively
(Staddon et al., 1995
;
Retta et al., 1996
;
Rao and Li, 1999
), all actin
cytoskeleton-dependent processes. However, reorganization of the actin
cytoskeleton implicates involvement of Rho GTPases, which are key regulators
of stress fiber formation and membrane ruffling
(Hall, 1998
;
Kaibuchi et al., 1999
).
Moreover, the subtypes RhoA, -B, and -C possess vicinal cysteinyl residues
within their guanine nucleotide binding region to be possibly affected by PAO.
Therefore, Rho GTPases have to be considered possible targets for PAO. This
study reveals that signaling activity of RhoA, but not of Rac is inhibited by
PAO in micromolar concentrations, whereby guanine nucleotide binding to loop I
is altered. The inactivation of RhoA by PAO causes reorganization of the
cytoskeleton, which differs from changes induced by vanadate, a PTPase
inhibitor that does not interfere with the nucleotide binding of RhoA.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, and L-fucose came from
Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Glutathione-Sepharose was from Amersham
Biosciences (Freiburg Germany). Rhodamine-phalloidin was purchased from
Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). RhoA antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), Rac1 antibody was from BD Transduction
Laboratories (Heidelberg, Germany). [
-32P]GTP and
[32P]NAD were from PerkinElmer (Boston, MA). All other substances
were of highest purity available. Cell Culture. Caco-2 cells were cultured under standard conditions in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% nonessential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were subcultured every week. For pull-down experiments, cells were seeded on Petri dishes (10 cm in diameter) and were grown until they reached confluence.
Rhodamine-Phalloidin Staining of Actin Filaments. Cells on cover slips were incubated in culture medium containing 5 or 50 µM phenylarsine oxide or 1 mM sodium ortho-vanadate for 45 min. Thereafter, cells were rinsed with PBS and incubated in 3% formaldehyde solution containing 0.05% Triton X-100 for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated with 15 ng/ml rhodamine-phalloidin. After three washes with PBS, coverslips were mounted on slides for fluorescence microscopy.
Purification of Recombinant Proteins. Clostridium limosum
exoenzyme C3 (C3lim) was prepared as described by Böhmer et
al. (1996
). Expression and
purification of recombinant RhoA and Rac1 was performed after standard
protocol for GST-fusion proteins. Expression of the GST-fusion proteins of the
Rho-binding domain of rhotekin (C-21) and the Rac-binding domain of Pak (Crib
domain) in BL21 cells growing at 37°C was induced by adding 0.1 mM
isopropyl
-D-thiogalactoside (final concentration) at
OD600 of 1.0. Two hours after induction, cells were collected and
lysed by sonication in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 2 mM
MgCl2, 2.0 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM PMSF). The
lysate was centrifuged at 10,000g, and the supernatant was used for
purification of GST-fusion proteins by affinity purification with
glutathione-Sepharose. Beads loaded with GST-fusion proteins were washed three
times with PBS and were used immediately for GTPase pull-down experiments.
Pull-Down Experiments with GST-C21 and GST-PAK Crib Domain.
Pull-down experiments were performed as described by Reid et al.
(1996
). After incubation with
PAO or vanadate, the culture medium was removed and cells were rinsed twice
with PBS. Cells were lysed by addition of 500 µl of ice-cold lysis buffer
(50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 3 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P40,
0.25% Triton X-100, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 100 µM PMSF). Cells were then
scraped from the Petri dishes, transferred into Eppendorf vials, and rotated
for 5 min at 4°C. The lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm and the
supernatant was used for pull-down experiments. Pull-down assay with
recombinant GTP[
S]-RhoA (1 µg) was performed in lysis buffer without
dithiothreitol. To this end, beads in 20 µl of slurry of the Rho binding
domain GST-C21 from Rhotekin or the Rac binding domain GST-Pak-Crib domain
bearing approximately 30 or 10 µg, respectively, of fusion protein, were
added to each sample and rotated at 4°C for 30 min. The beads were
collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm and washed twice with lysis buffer.
To each sample, 20 µl of Laemmli buffer was added to the beads and 12%
SDS-PAGE with subsequent transfer of proteins onto nitrocellulose was
performed. RhoA and Rac1 were detected by Western blot using specific
antibody.
Exoenzyme C3-Catalyzed [32P]ADP-Ribosylation of RhoA. For ADP-ribosylation studies, cells were lysed in 500 µl of ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM NaCl, 20 µM HEPES, pH 7.4, 4 mM MgCl2, and 10 µM PMSF) and briefly sonicated on ice. Cell lysates (50 µl; 100 µg of protein) were subjected to subsequent [32P]ADP-ribosylation assay by adding 15 µl of ribosylation mix to a final concentration of 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM thymidine, 5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 2.5 mM NAD. To start ADP-ribosylation, 0.5 µCi of [32P]NAD and 50 ng of C. limosum exoenzyme C3lim were added. For ADP-ribosylation of recombinant proteins 0.5 µg of RhoAwt were incubated in 15 µl of ribosylation buffer containing 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide with or without 200 µM PAO. Exoenzyme C3lim and [32P]NAD were added to a final concentration of 0.75 µg/ml and 0.1 µCi per sample, respectively. The samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C and the reaction was stopped by addition of 20 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were separated on 12.5% SDS-PAGE, and [32P]ADP-ribosylated proteins were analyzed by filmless autoradiographic analysis.
Mant-GDP Exchange. This method was performed after a method
described by Sehr et al.
(1998
). In brief, recombinant
RhoA or Rac1 was incubated in 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, and 10 µM
GDP for 15 min on ice. After this, the Rho/Rac GDP-bound form was stabilized
by adding 10 µM MgCl2. Before starting the mant-GDP exchange, 5
µg of RhoA or 50 µg of Rac1 were allowed to equilibrate in a cuvette in
500 µl of triethanolamine buffer (50 µM triethanolamine, 2 mM
MgCl2) for 5 min at 37°C. The assay was started by adding
mant-GDP to a final concentration of 10 mM, and the fluorescence was measured
every 20 s (excitation, 357 nm; emission, 444 nm).
Guanine Nucleotide Release Assay. The release of the guanine
nucleotide from RhoA by treatment with PAO was measured by release of bound
[
-32P]GTP from the GTPases. Therefore, 100 µg of RhoA in
1 ml of triethanolamine buffer (50 µM triethanolamine and 2 mM
MgCl2) were incubated at 30°C. The uptake of GTP was started by
adding [
-32P]GTP to the Rho GTPases to a final concentration
of 200 mM. At indicated time points, 50 µl was taken from the solution and
transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter. The filters were washed twice with 3
ml of buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, and 2 mM MgCl2)
to remove all unbound [
-32P]GTP. After 30 min of loading
with [
-32P]GTP, PAO was added to a final concentration of 50
µM, and the release of [
-32P]GTP from RhoA was measured
for additional 40 min. The RhoA-bound [
-32P]GTP was measured
in a scintillation counter.
Gel Shift Assay. To remove excessive dithiothreitol (DTT), recombinant RhoA in 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 1 mM DTT was filtrated using microcon (10-kDa cut off) and was washed three times with 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 1 µM DTT. RhoA was incubated with or without 100 µM PAO for further 60 min at 4°C. Laemmli sample buffer [5 µl (5-fold)] with or without 10 mM DTT was given to a 25-µl sample, and 12% SDS-PAGE was performed.
Mass Determination By Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Mass Spectrometry. Enzymatic protein cleavage: 10 µl of buffered solutions of Rho A and its PAO derivative (2 mg/ml in 0.15 M NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM glutathione, and 0.2 mM GDP, pH 7.0) were mixed with 30 µl of PBS (0.05 M NaH2PO4, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.7) before the addition of 6 µl of an endoproteinase Glu-C solution (1 mg/ml; EC 3.4.21.19 [EC] , Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The incubation was performed overnight under gentle stirring at 25°C followed by measuring the mass spectra by MALDI-MS.
MALDI mass spectra from the intact and PAO-modified Rho A and their
proteolytic cleavage products were obtained on a Voyager DE Pro mass
spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany). Data were acquired in
the positive linear operation mode after external calibration using a matrix
of
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid mixed with L-fucose
according to the dried drop technique. Data acquisition and analyses were
performed using the Voyager control software and Data Explorer version 4.0
software supplied by the manufacturer. Samples of proteolytic incubation
mixtures were desalted using ZipTips (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and intact
proteins were initially diluted 1:10 in acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid
before MALDI-MS measurements.
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis. N-terminal sequencing of HPLC-purified peptides was performed on a Procise 494 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) by Edman degradation using the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Inhibition of Rho GTPases by PAO-Treatment of cells. The Rho- and
Rac-binding domains of the effector proteins rhotekin (C21) and PAK,
respectively, were used to precipitate the active, GTP-bound forms of GTPases
from cell lysates (pull-down assay). The Western blot analysis of the
precipitates of PAO-treated cells showed a dose-dependent decrease in active
RhoA compared with control cells. Incubation of cells with 5 µM PAO for 45
min reduced the amount of RhoA binding to C21, whereas 50 µM completely
abolished binding of RhoA to C21 (Fig.
2A). In contrast, vanadate did not affect, or even slightly
increased, the binding of RhoA to C21. The pull-down experiments using GST-Pak
crib domain to study activation of Rac proteins revealed no effect of either
PAO (5 and 50 µM) or vanadate (1 mM) on Rac activation
(Fig. 2A). In accordance with
cellular RhoA, recombinant RhoA activated by GTP[
S] also showed reduced
binding to C21 when incubated with 50 µM PAO
(Fig. 2B). To exclude
nonspecific effects of PAO, we preincubated GST-C21 beads (three cysteines
within C21) with 10 µM PAO, which is the maximum final concentration of
residual PAO in pull-down assays. Preincubation did not disturb interaction
with RhoA-GTP[
S], suggesting a specific effect of PAO on Rho.
|
PAO Alters Conformation of RhoA, -B, and -C. To exclude intracellular degradation of RhoA after PAO modification, RhoA content was checked by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A, PAO (50 µM) treatment did not alter the RhoA content of the cells within the observed period of 90 min. However, PAO led to an altered migration behavior of RhoA on SDS-PAGE, indicating a direct covalent modification of RhoA by PAO. The changed migration behavior of RhoA was also tested with recombinant RhoA; to this end, recombinant RhoA (10 µM) incubated with and without PAO (100 µM) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. In fact, PAO-modified RhoA migrated faster than unmodified RhoA (Fig. 3B), corroborating the data obtained with cellular Rho. This effect was reversed when PAO-modified RhoA was incubated with 10 mM dithiothreitol before electrophoresis.
|
To test the influence of PAO on the structure of RhoA, RhoA was subjected
to C3lim -catalyzed [32P]ADP-ribosylation,
because C3lim exclusively modifies native RhoA
(Habermann et al., 1991
). RhoA
from cells, treated with 50 µM PAO (Fig.
3C), was not substrate for C3lim. The same
was true for recombinant RhoA. An effect of PAO on the transferase
C3lim can be excluded, because C3lim does not contain
any cysteinyl residue.
Effect of PAO on the Guanine Nucleotide Binding of Rho GTPases. The direct effect of PAO on RhoA was tested by the mant-GDP binding assay. After addition of fluorescent mant-GDP to RhoA, a rapid increase in fluorescence could be observed. This increase indicated an exchange of guanine nucleotide accompanied by binding of mant-GDP to RhoA. After 20 min, the exchange reached a plateau, and no further increase of fluorescence was detected (Fig. 4). Preincubation of RhoA with 50 µM PAO prevented an increase in fluorescence, indicating that PAO inhibited the exchange or a binding of nucleotides. As shown in Fig. 4, bottom, addition of PAO to RhoA-mantGDP induced a rapid decrease in fluorescence, caused by the release of mant-GDP from RhoA.
|
In contrast to RhoA, binding of mant-GDP to Rac1 was not affected by PAO (Fig. 4, right). Nontreated as well as PAO-treated Rac1 showed a rapid increase in fluorescence after addition of mant-GDP, which was saturated after 10 min. The maximum fluorescence of PAO-treated sample is marginally lower than that of control Rac1 and was always within variation of separate experiments. In contrast to RhoA, addition of PAO to mant-GDP loaded Rac1 did not decrease fluorescence, indicating still-bound mant-GDP and lack of interference of PAO with mant-GDP.
PAO Releases Guanine Nucleotides from Rho GTPases. The GTP/GDP
release from RhoA is shown in Fig.
5. After addition of [
-32P]GTP to the samples,
there was a time-dependent increase in binding of [
-32P]GTP
to RhoA, which was saturated after 30 min; controls showed stable nucleotide
binding for a further 40 min. Intrinsic GTPase activity of Rho GTPases leads
to an equilibrium of GTP and GDP binding to RhoA in this assay. Thus, labeled
nucleotide can be GTP as well as GDP. Release of GTP from RhoA was also
indicated by pull-down assay as shown in
Fig. 2B. Addition of PAO (50
µM) to the sample resulted in a time-dependent decrease of bound
nucleotide, leading to an almost complete release from RhoA within 40 min. In
contrast to RhoA, the GTP binding to Rac1 remained unaffected by PAO. Rac1
showed a time-dependent loading with [
-32P]GTP, which was
saturated after 60 min. Addition of PAO did not interfere with the nucleotide
binding to Rac1. A statistical analysis of nucleotide binding 30 min after
PAO-treatment was inserted into the time lapse of
Fig. 5 as bar charts.
|
Crosslinking of Cysteinyl Residues by PAO. Separated mass
determinations of RhoA (
22,164 Da) and its PAO-treated derivative
(
22,325 Da) by MALDI-MS resulted in a mass difference of about 161 Da.
N-terminal sequence analyses by Edman degradation revealed the first 12 amino
acids (GPLGSMAAIRKK), confirming the expected recombinant RhoA sequence
(Fig. 6). With regard to the
accuracy of the determination of high molecular mass compounds (0.1%), the
expected mass difference of 150 Da was found. Additionally, enzymatic cleavage
and mass determinations of both substrates by endoproteinase Glu-C allowed
high sequence recovery and assignment of the pure and cross-linked N terminus
as indicated in Fig. 6. Mass
spectra of the desalted incubation mixtures of RhoA and its PAO product showed
many distinct signals in the mass range between 1,000 and 4,500 Da. Most of
these signals were found in both digests, except the signals at
m/z 3859.9 (only detected in the Rho A digest) and
m/z 4011.9 (only detected in the Rho A-PAO digest). The
assigned sequences could also be confirmed by Edman degradation after HPLC
separation of the incubation mixture. These results underline the assumed
quantitative cross-link between the two cysteinyl residues located within the
guanine nucleotide-binding loop. Signals that could not be assigned to the
expected cleavage products of Rho A or endoproteinase Glu-C itself
(C-terminally at glutamic acid and aspartic acid) may be caused by initial
peptidic or proteinaceous impurities.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Based on our results, we concluded that PAO acts directly on the signal
transduction level of RhoA. A first hint of a modification of RhoA by PAO was
given by gel shift assay. The downward gel shift of PAO-treated RhoA was
detected with endogenous as well as with recombinant RhoA. The downward shift
is not in accordance with an increase in molecular mass because of adduction
of PAO; rather, it indicates conformational changes of RhoA. Such a reversed
effect can also be detected by cytotoxic-necrotizing factor-induced
deamidation of RhoA (Gerhard R. et al.,
1998
). A lower molecular mass induces an upward shift to higher
apparent molecular masses on SDS-PAGE. Additional evidence of a covalent
binding of PAO to RhoA was expected by MALDI-MS analysis
(Kussmann and Przybylski,
1995
). The comparison of the complete modified and unmodified
proteins, as well as their endoproteinase Glu-Cgenerated peptides,
confirmed the hypothesis of an PAO-adduct. The covalent modification of RhoA
by PAO raised the question of its functional effects. The finding that PAO
binds to the N-terminal region of RhoA, where the GTP-binding domain resides,
suggests interference with the nucleotide exchange or binding. In fact, the
modification of Rho by PAO alters guanine nucleotide binding. The effect of
PAO on the nucleotide binding was investigated by GDP-exchange assay and
additional GTP-release assay. To exclude false results in GDP-exchange assay
caused by quenching effects of PAO on the mant-GDP fluorescence, we also
assayed GTP-release from RhoA by filtration technique. The release of
[
-32P]GTP from preloaded RhoA in combination with the
mant-GDP fluorescence experiments showed that binding of PAO to RhoA is
dominant compared with guanine nucleotide binding. Binding of PAO occurs to
GDP-bound as well as GTP-bound RhoA. Because the loss of nucleotide causes
inactivation of GTPases, the activity state of endogenous RhoA was tested with
pull-down assay. In accordance with the observed nucleotide release,
PAO-treatment led to inactivation of cellular RhoA. In general, liberation of
guanine nucleotide leads to conformational changes, or even to denaturation of
the GTPases. Accordingly, PAO-treated, nucleotide-free recombinant RhoA and
cellular RhoA from PAO-treated cells were no longer substrate for exoenzyme
C3. Thus, PAO, which binds to the nucleotide-binding region, does not
substitute the nucleotide in its ability to maintain conformational features
of RhoA. Nevertheless, we did not observe a degradation of modified RhoA
within the cells over a period of 90 min. So far, it is unclear whether
adduction of phenylarsine prevents RhoA from being degraded or modified RhoA
is sequestered by regulatory proteins, such as guanine nucleotide-exchange
factors. As can be deduced from our results, RhoA modified by PAO loses its
ability to interact with the Rho-binding domains of effector proteins,
resulting in inhibition of downstream signaling
(Bishop and Hall, 2000
).
The finding that RhoA is functionally inactivated by PAO contradicts the
reported activation of RhoA by inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases
(Schoenwaelder and Burridge,
1999
). This activation was explained as an effect upstream in the
Rho signaling pathway. In the present study, we cannot exclude similar
regulatory effects of PAO at lower concentrations that were caused by
inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases. Nevertheless, we provide profound
evidence that even micromolar concentrations of PAO result in inactivation of
RhoA.
PAO that cross-links vicinal thiol groups affects RhoA in vitro and in
vivo, but not Rac1. The inactivation of RhoA and its isotypes RhoB and C is
caused by binding of PAO to cysteinyl residues 16 and 20 within the guanine
nucleotide-binding region (Fig.
7). Rac GTPases that only possess one cysteine residue in position
20 (according to RhoA sequence) are unaffected by PAO regarding mant-GDP
exchange and GTP-release. Furthermore, endogenous Rac1 was not affected by PAO
in the pull-down assay. Inactivation of RhoA by PAO, but not of Rac1,
interferes with the cross talk between Rho and Rac, altering the balance
between Rho and Rac functions. This alteration leads to a prevalence of
cellular Rac functions (Van Aelst and
D'Souza-Schorey, 1997
). Considering this notion, the effects of
Rac on the cytoskeleton, such as increase in cortical actin filaments, may be
pronounced even without increased activation of Rac. This effect may also
contribute to the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton induced by lower
PAO concentrations.
|
Rho GTPases not only regulate the organization of the actin cytoskeleton,
but also can govern the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway
(Teramoto et al.,
1996a
,b
).
It is known that arsenical compounds are able to induce activation of the JNK
via Rho and Rac in human embryonic kidney 293 cells
(Porter et al., 1999
). In that
study, activation of JNK was dose-dependent and was maximal at 300 µM
arsenite/arsenate. Expression of inactive Rho mutants could abolish the
arsenite/arsenate-induced JNK activation. We found similar effects; 5 µM
PAO led to activation of JNK (data not shown). Interestingly, 50 µM PAO,
which led to total inactivation of RhoA in Caco-2 cells, totally inhibited JNK
activity. Further experiments must characterize the specificity of inorganic
arsenical compounds compared with phenylarsine oxide regarding their ability
to inactivate Rho GTPases and their effects on the signal transduction
downstream of Rho.
In summary, PAOin addition to its property to block phosphatasesinhibits cellular functions of RhoA by covalent binding to the guanine nucleotide-binding region, resulting in altered nucleotide binding. The overall effect of PAO is the inhibition of RhoA downstream signaling. Because of its specificity toward GTPases, PAO may be a model compound to develop cell-permeable selective inhibitors of cellular Rho function.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: PAO, phenylarsine oxide; PTPase, phosphotyrosine
phosphatase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; C3lim, Clostridium
limosum exoenzyme C3; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PMSF,
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; GTP[
S], guanosine
5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis; DTT, dithiothreitol; MALDI-MS, matrix assisted laser
desorption ionization-mass spectrometry; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase.
Address correspondence to: Ralf Gerhard, Institut für Toxikologie, Medizinische Hochschule, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail: gerhard.ralf{at}mh-hannover.de
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bishop AL and Hall A (2000) Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem J 348: 241255.
Bogumil R, Namgaladze D, Schaarschmidt D, Schmachtel T, Hellstern S, Mutzel R, and Ullrich V (2000) Inactivation of calcineurin by hydrogen peroxide and phenylarsine oxide. Evidence for a dithiol-disulfide equilibrium and implications for redox regulation. Eur J Biochem 267: 14071415.[Medline]
Böhmer J, Jung M, Sehr P, Fritz G, Popoff M, Just I, and Aktories K (1996) Active site mutation of the C3-like ADP-ribosyltransferase from Clostridium limosum-analysis of glutamic acid 174 Biochemistry 35: 282289.[CrossRef][Medline]
Costantini P, Belzacq AS, La Vieira H, Larochette N, de Pablo MA, Zamzami N, Susin SA, Brenner C, and Kroemer G (2000) Oxidation of a critical thiol residue of the adenine nucleotide translocator enforces Bcl-2-independent permeability transition pore opening and apoptosis. Oncogene 19: 307314.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerhard R, Schmidt G, Hofmann F, and Aktories K (1998)
Activation of Rho GTPases by Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing
factor 1 increases intestinal permeability in Caco-2 cells. Infect
Immunol 66:
51255131.
Habermann B, Mohr C, Just I, and Aktories K (1991) ADP-ribosylation and de-ADP-ribosylation of the Rho protein by Clostridium botulinum exoenzyme C3. Regulation by EDTA, guanine nucleotides and pH. Biochim Biophys Acta 1077: 253258.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hall A (1998) Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton.
Science (Wash DC) 279:
509514.
Kaibuchi K, Kuroda S, and Amano M (1999) Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 459486.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kussmann M and Przybylski M (1995) Tertiary structure-selective characterization of protein dithiol groups by phenylarsine oxide modification and mass spectrometric peptide mapping. Methods Enzymol 251: 430435.[Medline]
Liao K, Hoffman RD, and Lane MD (1991) Phosphotyrosyl
turnover in insulin signaling. Characterization of two membrane-bound pp15
protein tyrosine phosphatases from 3T3L1 adipocytes. J Biol
Chem 266:
65446553.
Noguchi T, Matzaki T, Horita K, Fujioka Y, and Kasuga M
(1994) Role of SH-PTP2, a protein-tyrosine phosphatase with Src
homology 2 domains, in insulin-stimulated Ras activation. Mol Cell
Biol 14:
66746682.
Oda M, Sakitani K, Kaibori M, Inoue T, Kamiyama Y, and Okumura T
(2000) Vicinal dithiol-binding agent, phenylarsine oxide,
inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase gene expression at a step of nuclear
factor-
B DNA binding in hepatocytes. J Biol
Chem 275:
43694373.
Porter AC, Fanger GR, and Vaillancourt RR (1999) Signal transduction pathways regulated by arsenate and arsenite. Oncogene 18: 77947802.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rao RK and Li L (1999) GSH oxidation and PTPase inhibition in regulation of epithelial paracellular permeability (Abstract). FASEB J 13: A728.
Reid T, Furuyashiki T, Ishizaki T, Watanabe G, Watanabe N and
Narumiya S (1996) Rhotekin, a new putative target for Rho bearing
homology to a serine/threonine kinase, PKN and rhophilin in the Rho-binding
domain. J Biol Chem 271:
1355613560.
Retta SF, Barry ST, Critchley DR, Defilippi P, Silengo L, and Tarone G (1996) Focal adhesion and stress fiber formation is regulated by tyrosine phosphatase activity. Exp Cell Res 229: 307317.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schoenwaelder SM and Burridge K (1999) Evidence for a
Calpeptin-sensitive protein-tyrosine phosphatase upstream of the small GTPase
Rho-A novel role for the calpain inhibitor calpeptin in the inhibition of
protein-tyrosine phosphatases. J Biol Chem
274:
1435914367.
Sehr P, Joseph G, Genth H, Just I, Pick E, and Aktories K (1998) Glucosylation and ADP-ribosylation of Rho proteins effects on nucleotide binding, GTPase activity and effector-coupling. Biochemistry 37: 52965304.[CrossRef][Medline]
Staddon JM, Herrenknecht K, Smales C, and Rubin LL (1995) Evidence that tyrosine phosphorylation may increase tight junction permeability. J Cell Sci 108: 609619.[Abstract]
Teramoto H, Coso OA, Miyata H, Igishi T, Miki T, and Gutkind JS
(1996a) Signaling from the small GTP-binding proteins Rac1 and
Cdc42 to the c-Jun N-terminal kinase stress-activated protein kinase
pathwaya role for mixed lineage kinase 3 protein-tyrosine kinase 1, a
novel member of the mixed lineage kinase family. J Biol
Chem 271:
2722527228.
Teramoto H, Crespo P, Coso OA, Igishi T, Xu NZ, and Gutkind JS
(1996b) The small GTP-binding protein Rho activates c-Jun
N-terminal kinases stress-activated protein kinases in human kidney 293T
cells evidence for a Pak-independent signaling pathway. J
Biol Chem 271:
2573125734.
Van Aelst L and D'Souza-Schorey C (1997) Rho GTPases
and signaling networks. Genes Dev
11:
22952322.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. W. Raines, M. G. Bonini, and S. L. Campbell Nitric oxide cell signaling: S-nitrosation of Ras superfamily GTPases Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2007; 75(2): 229 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Montaudon, K. Palle, L. P. Rivory, J. Robert, C. Douat-Casassus, S. Quideau, M.-A. Bjornsti, and P. Pourquier Inhibition of Topoisomerase I Cleavage Activity by Thiol-reactive Compounds: IMPORTANCE OF VICINAL CYSTEINES 504 AND 505 J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14403 - 14412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sokolovski and M. R. Blatt Nitric Oxide Block of Outward-Rectifying K+ Channels Indicates Direct Control by Protein Nitrosylation in Guard Cells Plant Physiology, December 1, 2004; 136(4): 4275 - 4284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Bailey, D. M. Sabatini, and B. R. Stockwell From The Cover: Microarrays of small molecules embedded in biodegradable polymers for use in mammalian cell-based screens PNAS, November 16, 2004; 101(46): 16144 - 16149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||